Friday, January 28, 2011

This is our Sputnik moment.

"Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik, we had no idea how we would beat them to the moon. The science wasn't even there yet. NASA didn't exist. But after investing in better research and education, we didn't just surpass the Soviets; we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.
This is our generation's Sputnik moment."
 -President Barack Obama in his 2011 State of the Union Address      

Interestingly, ever since we began to talk about rhetoric in class, I've been unconsciously noting the use of ethos, pathos, and logos of everything I hear. In politics, I think it's especially intriguing because it not only reflects the current mind-set of the politician or the public, but goes further to reflect the historical tendency of the American society as a whole. Upon listening to President Obama's State of the Union Address and revisiting the addresses of 2008 and 2010, it reminded me once again how heavily the American public is dependent on the pathos of things. While the use of pathos is inevitable in any given situation where a public appeal is necessary, presidential speeches tend to rely on it more heavily than any other rhetorical means of persuasion.
President Obama, has the tendency to make an appeal by reaching into America's past and using historical nostalgia to stir up feelings of morale. He uses this so heavily in fact, that while I was listening to his address this year, I recalled noting his use of historical nostalgia during his previous addresses. In 2008, Obama, referencing to World War II, Black Tuesday, and Bloody Sunday, drew an emotional mental picture for the American public. He closed that portion of his speech with a heart-thumping, foot-stomping, fist-pumping remark: "Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history's call."
Similarly,  in this week's State of the Union Address, Obama again referenced history to rally the hearts of Americans. Alluding to America's past victories, Obama put emphasis on the fact that what America has done once, America can do again. Referencing to our "space race" against the Soviet Union, Obama boasted of America's victory in the face of hopelessness. He then appealed to the public's sense of pathos by declaring that "This is our generation's Sputnik moment."  I think Obama's rhetorical technique is ingenious and suitable for such an audience from a country that prides herself on her rich history and patriotism. 
After this week's State of the Union Address, I found it fascinating to observe the rhetorical tendencies of our presidents. Perhaps this will be a recurring theme... George W. Bush for next week?
Yes.. from "crest and whiskey" to presidential rhetorical tendencies. Big change, I know. :)

3 comments:

  1. I love the reference to Sputnik that is used. It is like a well crafted and flexible way of using a comparison from past events. Sputnik occurred in a recent enough time frame that people who are older remember it happening. At the same time, the younger generations are able to recognize something like that because it is close enough to present day that they have probably heard the story. It is also a great in what we accomplished at the time. President Obama wants people to realize the our country can recover quickly because we are ingenious people. I don't agree with President Obama, but I hope that he can fix things through his very own Sputnik plan.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also tuned in Tuesday night to watch President Obama's State of the Union Address. I too picked up on the strong use of pathos. I also noticed just how important delivery, tone, and style were in conveying the overall message to the American people. I think you made a great observation and I also find it interesting to examine the rhetorical devices used by our presidents.

    ReplyDelete
  3. President Obama certainly does make current events relevant with the help of our nation's momentous events of the past and I appreciate the way you captured it. Do you agree that the position we find ourselves in is truly comparable to sputnik, or do you find it to be more dramatic than it makes itself out to be?

    ReplyDelete